NATIONS AND MORALITY
Nations are fictions designed by those with power over others by a number of means. Nations are the fictions; power is the reality. And the ?power-over-status? serves only the goals of those in power, though there may be benefits to those not in power. The issue is not: where I live, or where I was born; but who or what has the power to control certain matters of my life and convert some of them from private to public. ?Nations can have moral significances,? says the guest; the question is who defines the ?significances? as ?moral,? and why. The attachment of ?moral? is a way to not have to discuss whether it is moral or not.
The new global community created by the internet (which doesn?t get any mention in the show!) is redefining political power completely, just as the internet is redefining everything. Believe it: those in power must (and many do) fear the internet more than any other political movement ? and they ought to. And so should all those who have a stake in the maintaining of pre-internet powers.

Freedom has no walls, and equal is the light of the promised land.
我不能带你去，因为我们已经在那里了，我们要做的就是成为它的一员。
Be true,
=
"Free at last..."

我不知道你说的“公民身份”是什么意思，但是古代雅典确实有这个概念。柏拉图和亚里士多德都写过公民身份。Check out The Stanford Encyclopedia entry on Ancient Political Philosophy here:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ancient-political/

Where does the state get the right to turn back migrants at the border? Is that really such a conundrum that the two hosts and the guest expert couldn't provide a satisfactory answer? Where does the state get the right to put convicted murderers in prison? Where does the state get the right to require pharmacists to be licensed? The American state gets its rights from the Constitution and legally passed statutes and legally issued executive orders.

马奎尔女士，及时再次提及这一问题。我觉得你在文章的第三段就说对了。混乱不利于经济稳定。欧洲无疑已经抓住了老虎的尾巴，我尤其为亲爱的老德国感到不安。我们所有人都是世界公民的观念在一段时间内当然是利他的。唉，世界可能已经不是以前的样子了，而坏角色(阿萨德、ISIS/ISIL和所有其他的wannabile)似乎就像从洞里钻出来的鼹鼠一样不断冒出来。最近，我创造了一些新的短语，试图简要描述我们自己(和其他人)所处的一些问题领域。1)复杂性使混乱复杂化:如果我们看看21世纪进步的许多影响，我们会看到越来越多的负面因素，因为我们不断地想做什么，想成为什么，嗯，越来越多。例如，我们的孩子，被赋予越来越少的时间做孩子。他们年纪越来越小了，对这种胡说八道的东西敬而远之。 And, often then, they become alienated from most everything else. It is all about progress, success and the treadmill of competition. It simply will not do for them to fall behind because although "winning" may not be everything, "losing" is nothing at all. 2) Complexity is nuclear, feeding upon itself. Or, in other more ominous terms, we have reached critical mass sociologically. I firmly believe this and that we should be very afraid. 3) Simplicity supports serenity. This was an axiom of an earlier age and is only now practiced by a faithful few (ascetics, regressives and the like). We cannot stop the train. Moreover, we cannot see any compelling need to do so.
It is too bad we have come so far in so many ways and one must wonder, I think: Where are we going now?
Warmest Regards,
Neuman.

Arvo, pace Laura, was quite right. The issue is problematic because, for one thing, national boundaries are not a national authority, they are all determined by bi-national or international agreement. It is odd, I suppose, that no one is calling for fences around our shorelines, or of removing the "dry-foot, wet foot" distinction, or ceasing the preferential status of Cuban immigrants. It is also difficult because the terms 'nation' and 'state' are confused. Poli-sci tries to clarify by defining 'nation' as a people, and 'state' as the apparatus of government. This gets obscured by the relation in the US between state and federal authority.
这里有一个有趣的想法，仔细阅读威廉·布拉德福德的普利茅斯历史发现清教徒不想在他们的"专利"允许的地区定居，因为"弗吉尼亚"，从卡罗莱纳到新泽西北部的任何地方，都在英国国教的管辖之世界杯赛程2022赛程表欧洲区下，这是他们想要避免的。他们希望在后来成为纽约的荷兰人附近的某个地方，能让他们拥有渴望已久的自由，但他们不想被荷兰语言或习俗同化。很明显，这群人中有些人一直都想要科德角，这一点我们只了解一点点。目的是在他们的合法所有权之外解决问题。非法定居:非法定居或“无证”定居未经允许越境不是犯罪，只是一种轻罪，不能作为重罪处罚。此外，大多数人来到这里，是为了在我们的法律下生活。因为他们更喜欢我们的法律，所以他们侵犯了边境。惩罚热爱我们法律的人似乎是不合常理的。无论如何，大多数移民现在停留一段时间然后离开，美国实际上处于净移民状态。 And, the very idea of border controls is very new. In fact, it may be the result of a disastrous policy of Woodrow Wilson to divide Europe on nationalist lines, hence the term "nationalism", which Hitler embraced to such infamy.
另一个更正，美国合法权威的基础不是宪法，而是被统治者的同意。失去这种区别是危险的。宪法从未得到人民的认可。它的通过只是基于一项权利法案的承诺，这并不完全像承诺的那样，但仅仅是，勉强，足够好。它不是圣经。正如我试图在另一个话题中解释的那样，许多人认为把法律以书面形式固定下来并不是一种解放的行为，最早的成文法律旨在奴役，包括《汉谟拉比法典》和《摩西律法》，至少巴比伦的“俘虏”在“返回”以色列时是这样报道的。

Just beyond the border is another border, and then another and another, and once we cross them all surely there is freedom, the light that follows the day, the promised land, free at last! I'll wait for you here. Be One, =

Call me "snarky", but:

The Bellman himself they all praised to the skies?
Such a carriage, such ease and such grace!
这样的严肃!One could see he was wise,
当有人看着他的脸的时候!
He had bought a large map representing the sea,
Without the least vestige of land:
And the crew were much pleased when they found it to be
一张他们都能看懂的地图。
"What's the good of Mercator's North Poles and Equators,
Tropics, Zones, and Meridian Lines?"
So the Bellman would cry: and the crew would reply
"They are merely conventional signs!
“其他地图也有这样的形状，有它们的岛屿和海角!
But we've got our brave Captain to thank
(So the crew would protest) "that he's bought us the best?
A perfect and absolute blank!"
This was charming, no doubt; but they shortly found out
That the Captain they trusted so well
Had only one notion for crossing the ocean,
And that was to tingle his bell.