The Value of Truth
Apr 04, 2006对真理的追求往往被认为具有“内在”价值。科学家和哲学家,他们回避宗教理由…
It isn't just the United States that is preoccupied with the threat of fake news. In Malaysia, a bill outlawing fake news just passed. The new law could mean jail time for those who not only create but also spread misleading information.
Meanwhile, what exactly qualifies as "fake news" remains unclear in the bill. The legislation raises the question: who gets to declare what is true, and conversely, what is false? The ambiguity behind how fake news is determined leaves open the possibility that the government will unjustly censor speech in the name of banning fake news.
Read more about Malaysia's bill against fake news here:
www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/world/asia/malaysia-fake-news-law.html
对真理的追求往往被认为具有“内在”价值。科学家和哲学家,他们回避宗教理由…
Most of us think we know the truth when we see it. But what exactly is truth, anyway? Philosophers have offered a blizzard of different...
Is there such a thing as absolute truth, independent of who is doing the thinking, and where? Or is truth relative to backgrounds, cultures, creeds, times, and places?
Everywhere we look -- in the media, in our political campaigns, in the hallowed halls of the academy -- we are confronted with an endle...
如果信念可以被描述为有一个目标或目的,那么肯定就像瞄准真理一样。
You've probably heard about the dangerous effects of fake news, and the spread of sensational and targeted falsities. But what about "legitimate" news, one might still ask?
对真理的追求往往被认为具有“内在”价值。科学家和哲学家,他们回避宗教理由…
Most of us think we know the truth when we see it. But what exactly is truth, anyway? Philosophers have offered a blizzard of different...
Is there such a thing as absolute truth, independent of who is doing the thinking, and where? Or is truth relative to backgrounds, cultures, creeds, times, and places?
Everywhere we look -- in the media, in our political campaigns, in the hallowed halls of the academy -- we are confronted with an endle...
如果信念可以被描述为有一个目标或目的,那么肯定就像瞄准真理一样。
You've probably heard about the dangerous effects of fake news, and the spread of sensational and targeted falsities. But what about "legitimate" news, one might still ask?
Comments(2)
Harold G. Neuman
Monday, April 16, 2018 -- 11:02 AM
Fake news in Malaysia. Hmmm.Fake news in Malaysia. Hmmm. Free speech may matter less there? I'll deliver a parable, of sorts, attempting to illustrate why such an action might not bode well for our form of democracy:
[In one of my own essays, I argued with myself about whether Philosophy was of any practical use in this world. In that personal confrontation, it was necessary to revisit the European Enlightenment (circa 16th century) and some of the eminent thinkers of that period. Through a bit of investigation, it was affirmed that old world fops and gadflies had a pronounced influence upon the US' founding fathers, and some mothers. Turns out that the emergent governmental structure had more than a little in common with the thinking and ideas of some fops and gadflies. I lost my own original argument. Philosophy augments our ability to think, either directly or indirectly.]
Therefore, if you are among the many who think of Philosophy as useless, pedantic puffery, let me suggest you re-read some historical documents. The Declaration of Independence is a good one, as is the US Constitution. Possibly, even the Federalist Papers. Take your time. You may change your mind.
Now, depending on who you believe, there has always been fake news. The Church treated science and astronomy as fake news when they failed to tow the ecclesiastical line. The penalties for such 'fake' news could be severe, but, at the time, the Church was unassailable; treated as an infallible force, making it a powerful adversary. I don't know if Malaysia really wants to 'go there'. Yet, perhaps that IS EXACTLY the place to which their rulers want to return. Even here, in the enlightened West, we still have flat-earthers. I don't think we throw them in jail for that...we certainly would not want to enact a law prohibiting flat-earth beliefs---would we?
Dr B
Wednesday, April 18, 2018 -- 5:24 AM
很好把!Here in the U很好把!在英国,关于脱欧(英国人民决定离开欧盟),我们发生了一场巨大的骚乱。现在,在2016年公投前夕,政府发布了所谓的事实、数据、观点、星相预测....都改名为“恐惧计划”,试图说服我们所有人,如果我们投票离开,这将导致英国经济立即崩溃,第三次世界大战,世界末日......甚至更糟。它没有发生!现在,我们有BBC从不能接受民主投票的团体、研究人员和个人那里大量输出统计数据和意见,显示世界末日的预测,当首相放屁而不是报告GDP增长、通货膨胀下降、就业增加等等时,他们在报道中是有选择性的。这是假新闻吗?