Do Philosophy For Its Own Sake, Not for a Job
Truman Chen

13 March 2017

In these days of economic insecurity, it's not surprising that students thinking of majoring in philosophy have difficulty convincing their family and friends. A new website, created by professor of philosophy Jack Russell Weinstein, titled "Philosophy is a Great Major" tries to work around this by pitching the philosophy major as actually a great way to make money. The website touts Peter Thiel, a former philosophy major at Stanford, as a "philosopher king of Silicon Valley." According to the website, "Philosophy is economic stability. Philosophy is freedom."

But isn't there something lost in pursuing a philosophical education for monetary gain? No one of course should be against philosophy majors making a decent living, but in trying to cater to those people who ask whether you're practicing the line "do you want fries with that?" do we lose sight of the value of a doing philosophy for its own sake? If this tactic of selling philosophy as something to be instrumentalized toward getting rich works, I suppose it will help to convince some people to more seriously consider philosophy when they wouldn't have otherwise. But at the same time, we would do well to reserve this pitch to the unconvinced around us, while firmly remaining authentically philosophically interested for those of us who need no convincing—monetary or otherwise. Instead of pitching it as a good sell, why not pitch it as something essential to democratic citizenry? Or a deeper appreciation for the arts? The list goes on...

Check out the website here:https://philosophyisagreatmajor.com/

Comments(3)


dedo's picture

dedo

Monday, March 13, 2017 -- 12:42 PM

合理的问题。When I

合理的问题。当我开始哲学的时候,我从来没有想过要赚钱,但也从来没有想过要建立一个民主的公民。我这样做是为了学习如何在一个充满秩序的世界中生活,并了解自己在其中的位置。如果做得好,这些都是有市场的技能/知识。不管有没有杠杆作用,哲学都是赚钱的强大基础,也应该以这种方式进行营销。学术本身对我来说没有意义。

Sheik_e's picture

Sheik_e

Monday, March 13, 2017 -- 9:25 PM

The solution may be to make

The solution may be to make it a core or mandatory course for K-12 and/ or a required part of ANY college or university degree. (This is philosophy per not the history of philosophy or the study of the "canon".) you will then. Not have to be concerned ab wasting your time on a narrowly focused unpacking of great ideas but an engaging with current concerns about your focus of study or the day to day issues of your life that can be informed by studying philosophy.

Jack Herrera's picture

Jack Herrera

Thursday, March 16, 2017 -- 11:13 AM

Truman your post reminds me

Truman your post reminds me of Lewis Hyde's famous book on creativity, The Gift (1983). Hyde writes that certain artistic achievements only work as long as they are gifts, and not pure commodities. Of course, a great painting can be sold, or an book of poems can be published, but something conceptual about the the actual art remains gift-like: part of what it gives us goes beyond its financial value. However, as soon as a painting's sole role becomes a commodity, it stops being a gift, and therefore stops being art. That's why we don't look at billboards the same way we look at paintings in art museums (in general, anyway).

也许哲学也是如此。当然,我们可以从哲学思考中得到补偿,但一旦哲学开始纯粹出于经济原因,它就不再是真正的哲学。这对我来说很有趣:然而,我想不出任何纯粹的商业哲学的例子。我们能想到雇佣哲学家的例子吗?别说彼得·蒂尔。