Thoughts on Retirement

06 January 2018

Retirement, as we think of it, goes like this. A person has a right, or maybe a duty, but at least a choice, to retire at a certain age, and between the government, his or her employers, and their own diligence, should have a pension to live on for the rest of their days without having to continue earning money. Retirement isn’t the sort of topic you can find much about in Plato, Aristotle, Descartes or Hume. It’s basically a nineteenth century German invention.

But there are philosophical questions. Given the scarcity of jobs in academia, and the aging professoriate, does one have a duty to retire? Or is the feeling that one has such a duty just plot to discriminate against old people?

People have different views of retirement. On the one hand, we have:

Retirement is like a long vacation in Las Vegas. The goal is to enjoy it the fullest, but not so fully that you run out of money. —Jonathan Clements

On the other hand, the view of two famous authors:

As to that leisure evening of life, I must say that I do not want it. I can conceive of no contentment of which toil is not to be the immediate parent. —Anthony Trollope

The only way to avoid being miserable [in retirement] is not to have enough leisure to wonder whether you are happy or not. —George Bernard Shaw

My advice to retirees is basically the same I give frosh:

College is a time to hold all the belief and goals that have been put in your head by parents, society, etc. up to the light, and see if they are really yours.

Retirement is the same. Decisions you made early in life, requirements for tenure, expectations of journals—all of this has shaped your life. But you can hold it up to the light and ask, should these things continue to guide my life? It’s hard to internalize the fact that things have changed. It’s hard to accept, after years of dreaming about spending your retirement on the golf course or fishing, that what you really enjoy is what you have been doing all along, sitting by yourself and writing. But that’s what happened to me.

On the other hand, you may find, after years of telling yourself that you love what you do for a living, that given the choice you’d rather play golf (one of the world's truly time-consuming and frustrating sports) or go fishing.

But these days, if you retire at 66, you may have twenty or thirty years left, or even more. Don’t waste it listening to the voices in your head from the past!

Comments(2)


Harold G. Neuman's picture

Harold G. Neuman

Sunday, January 7, 2018 -- 12:26 PM

明智的建议,佩里教授。

明智的建议,佩里教授。我在担任公职期间所做的写作只是从金钱的意义上得到了回报。在过去十年左右的时间里,我一直在写作,这是我至少20年来一直想做的事情。我想我还能再活二十年。但是,我很乐意接受别人给我的……
Neuman.

mirugai's picture

mirugai

Monday, January 8, 2018 -- 11:45 AM

Finally, a use for philosophy

最后,哲学的一个用法(除了“不划清界限是不道德的时候划清界限”(比如,胎儿的生命从什么时候开始)):如何利用退休后获得的自由。这个项目在讨论“工作”对个人实现的必要性时,在机器人取代人类工人的讨论中,有了一个很好的开始。我当时评论说,没有人应该担心不工作,我很惊讶我遇到的很多人都擅长绘画,或写诗,或弹钢琴或吉他,或电气和管道维修,或说其他语言,或上东欧历史等课程。

今天的我还是16岁时的我——同样的兴趣,同样的激情,同样的心态,同样的智慧。我已经退休25年了,每天仍然没有多余的一分钟可以浪费(我甚至认为睡眠是对有意识的宝贵时间的浪费)。每天我1。写点东西2。3.画图。演奏一种乐器。研究一个主题或读诗歌。约翰,我也到了打高尔夫不再有趣的地步,所以我放弃了一段时间,直到它听起来又有趣了。以下是我在75:1打高尔夫球的乐趣。从红色球座开始击球。 Carry only 4 (to tee off with) 5, 7, PW and putter in a tiny bag. 3. Tee up all fairway shots. 4. Keep track only of pars and birdies (check mark on the scorecard). And you still get to walk in beautiful nature, with a few strangers whose behavior is governed by the civility of etiquette, and get the only recreational exercise possible for a 75 year old.